CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

PICC Property and Casualty

Chinese listed insurer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ80556618 ↗
Source-derived summary

PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited (PICC P&C) is the largest non-life insurance company in mainland China incorporated in 2003. It was one of the three main subsidiaries of the People's Insurance Company of China.

PICC P&C is principally engaged in the provision of property and casualty insurance products. It operates its insurance business through motor vehicle, commercial property, cargo, liability, accidental injury and health, agriculture, homeowners and credit.

History

The People's Insurance Company of China (PICC) was established in 1949 and later renamed the People's Insurance Group of China. In July 2003, the People's Insurance Group founded the People's Property & Casualty Insurance Company of China (PICC P&C), with a registered capital of 12.25598 billion yuan. The company, registered in the People's Republic of China, inherited all the commercial assets, liabilities, and branches of the original People's Insurance Company of China, operating all insurance businesses except life insurance.

On November 6, 2003, PICC P&C was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. It is currently the largest non-life insurance company in mainland China, offering a variety of property insurance products to customers across different sectors. It is also one of the "Eight Banks and Five Insurances" among Hong Kong's Chinese-funded financial stocks.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “PICC Property and Casualty” is chinese listed insurer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through PICC, Property and Casualty, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 1949—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2003. For this dossier, PICC, Property and Casualty is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “chinese listed insurer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q80556618. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 1949.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “PICC Property and Casualty”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow PICC Property and Casualty primary sources, PICC Property and Casualty archive and PICC research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “PICC Property and Casualty”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “PICC Property and Casualty” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.