CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

laboratory technique for separation of DNA

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ855275
Source-derived summary

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a technique used for the separation of large DNA molecules by applying an electric field that periodically changes direction to a gel matrix. The mechanism driving these separations exploits the fact that very large DNA molecules unravel and "snake" through a gel matrix, and such electrophoretic trajectories are perturbed in a size-dependent manner by carefully oriented electrical pulses. Unlike standard agarose gel electrophoresis, which can separate DNA fragments of up to 50 kb, PFGE resolves fragments up to 10 Mb. This allows for the direct analysis of genomic DNA.

History

In 1984, David C. Schwartz and Charles Cantor published the first successful application of alternating electric fields for the separation of large DNA molecules. This technique, which they named PFGE, resulted in the development of several variations, including Orthogonal Field Alternation Gel Electrophoresis (OFAGE), Transverse Alternating Field Electrophoresis (TAFE), Field-Inversion Gel Electrophoresis (FIGE), and Clamped Homogeneous Electric Fields (CHEF), among others.

Procedure

The procedure for PFGE is similar to that of standard agarose gel electrophoresis, with the main exception being the application of the electric current. Generally, in PFGE electrophoresis chambers, the voltage periodically switches between three directions: one along the central axis, and two at a 60 degree angle along each side. The application of the voltage can change depending on the variation of PFGE used.

Applications

PFGE may be used for genotyping or genetic fingerprinting. It has commonly been considered a gold standard in epidemiological studies of pathogenic organisms for several decades.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis” is laboratory technique for separation of DNA. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Pulsed-field, electrophoresis and laboratory, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Pulsed-field, electrophoresis and laboratory is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “laboratory technique for separation of DNA” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q855275. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1984.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis primary sources, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis archive and Pulsed-field research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.