P-adic number
number system for a prime p which extends the ordinary arithmetic of the rational numbers in a different way from the extension of the rational number system to the real and complex number systems

In number theory, given a prime number p, the p-adic numbers form an extension of the rational numbers that is distinct from the real numbers, though with some similar properties; p-adic numbers can be written in a form similar to (possibly infinite) decimals, but with digits based on a prime number p rather than ten, and extending to the left rather than to the right.
For example, comparing the expansion of the rational number
1
5
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{5}}}
in base 3 versus the 3-adic expansion,
1
5
=
0.
0121
¯
(
base
3
)
=
0
⋅
3
0
+
0
⋅
3
−
1
+
1
⋅
3
−
2
+
2
⋅
3
−
3
+
⋯
1
5
=
1210
¯
2
(
3-adic
)
=
⋯
+
2
⋅
3
3
+
1
⋅
3
2
+
0
⋅
3
1
+
2
⋅
3
0
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{alignedat}{3}{\tfrac {1}{5}}&{}=0.{\overline {0121}}\ ({\text{base }}3)&&{}=0\cdot 3^{0}+0\cdot 3^{-1}+1\cdot 3^{-2}+2\cdot 3^{-3}+\cdots \\[5mu]{\tfrac {1}{5}}&{}={\overline {1210}}2\ \ ({\text{3-adic}})&&{}=\cdots +2\cdot 3^{3}+1\cdot 3^{2}+0\cdot 3^{1}+2\cdot 3^{0}.\end{alignedat}}}
Formally, given a prime number p, a p-adic number can be defined as a series
s
=
∑
i
=
k
∞
a
i
p
i
=
a
k
p
k
+
a
k
+
1
p
k
+
1
+
a
k
+
2
p
k
+
2
+
⋯
{\displaystyle s=\sum _{i=k}^{\infty }a_{i}p^{i}=a_{k}p^{k}+a_{k+1}p^{k+1}+a_{k+2}p^{k+2}+\cdots }
where k is an integer (possibly negative), and each
a
i
{\displaystyle a_{i}}
is an integer such that
0
≤
a
i
<
p
.
{\displaystyle 0\leq a_{i}<p.}
A p-adic integer is a p-adic number such that
k
≥
0.
{\displaystyle k\geq 0.}
In general, the series that represents a p-adic number is not convergent in the usual sense, but it is convergent for the p-adic absolute value
|
s
|
p
=
p
−
k
,
{\displaystyle |s|_{p}=p^{-k},}
where k is the least integer i such that
a
i
≠
0
{\displaystyle a_{i}\neq 0}
(if all
a
i
{\displaystyle a_{i}}
are zero, one has the zero p-adic number, which has 0 as its p-adic absolute value).
Every rational number can be uniquely expressed as the sum of a series as above, with respect to the p-adic absolute value. This allows considering rational numbers as special p-adic numbers, and alternatively defining the p-adic numbers as the completion of the rational numbers for the p-adic absolute value, exactly as the real numbers are the completion of the rational numbers for the usual absolute value.
p-adic numbers were first described by Kurt Hensel in 1897, though, with hindsight, some of Ernst Kummer's earlier work can be interpreted as implicitly using p-adic numbers.
For every prime number p, the p-adic numbers form a field.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “P-adic number” is number system for a prime p which extends the ordinary arithmetic of the rational numbers in a different way from the extension of the rational number system to the real and complex number systems. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through P-adic, number and system, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “number system for a prime p which extends the ordinary arithmetic of the rational numbers in a different way from the extension of the rational number system to the real and complex number systems” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q311627. The Library of Congress control number is sh85096402. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1210 and 1897.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “P-adic number”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow P-adic number primary sources, P-adic number archive and P-adic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “P-adic number”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “P-adic number” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.