CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Ozothamnus leptophyllus

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ13937549 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ozothamnus leptophyllus, commonly known as tauhinu or cottonwood, is an endemic shrub of New Zealand. Tauhinu is fast-growing, reaching 2 metres in height and is a common plant of coastal farmland. This species is host to the larvae of the New Zealand endemic moth Homoeosoma anaspila.

Description

This dicot plant species is described as a gray or yellow-green bushy shrub being as tall as 5 meters, but most commonly stands at a height of around 2 to 3 meters tall. The stems of these leaves are very tomentose, meaning that the stems of these plants are covered with dense wooly hairs. Ozothamnus leptophyllus has simple broad leaves with an alternate leaf arrangement pattern which they use for photosynthesis and are self-supporting, only needing itself to grow vertically. Young leaves are slightly sticky, but when mature range from being glabrous to moderately hairy with a moderate amount of white hair populating the surface of the leaf. Leaves are up to 3mm wide and are spatulate. The branchlets of the plant are slender and hairless and the petioles, the stalk that attaches the leaf to the stem, surround branchlets and where leaves are arranged in series of three to four. The flowers of this plant tend to mostly be white, though on occasion have touches of pink or red on the bud, and have 4–15 florets per capitulum.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ozothamnus leptophyllus” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ozothamnus, leptophyllus and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 226-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Ozothamnus, leptophyllus and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13937549. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ozothamnus leptophyllus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ozothamnus leptophyllus primary sources, Ozothamnus leptophyllus archive and Ozothamnus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ozothamnus leptophyllus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ozothamnus leptophyllus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.