CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Our Man in the Company

Australian comedy television series

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ48813979 ↗
Source-derived summary

Our Man in the Company is an Australian comedy series which screened on the ABC in 1973 and 1974. This series was a spin-off from the controversial series Our Man in Canberra, debuted in New South Wales on 7 July 1973 and ended on 27 August 1974.

Our Man in Canberra

Our Man in Canberra had its origins in one episode of the anthology series The Comedy Game, which was broadcast in November 1971. The pilot was filmed outside the Old Parliament House. The first episode of the series was meant to air on 3 June 1972, written by John O'Grady. However, the series' production was cancelled in May 1972, due to legal reasons, with an episode costing $10,000 to film. The series was in breach of Section 116 (II) of the Broadcasting and Television Act of Australia. It was dropped in March 1973, resulting in the cast and the Australian Broadcasting Commission open to contempt charges of parliament.

Cast

Jeff Ashby as Humphrey Sullivan

Katy Wild as Kate Sullivan

Walter Sullivan as The Minister/The Director

Delore Whiteman as Ena Wheeler

Benita Collings as Turner

Kerry McGuire as Marcia

Lex Mitchell as Pub Philosopher

Graham Rouse as Pub Philosopher

Reg Gorman as TV Technician

See also

List of Australian television series

Notes

External links

Our Man in the Company at IMDb

"Our Man in the Company". Classic Australian TV. Archived from the original on 18 March 2005.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Our Man in the Company” as australian comedy television series. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1973, 1974, 1971, 1972—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Company, Australian and comedy can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as australian comedy television series. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q48813979. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1973, 1974, 1971 and 1972.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Our Man in the Company”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Our Man in the Company primary sources, Our Man in the Company archive and Company research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Our Man in the Company”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Our Man in the Company” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.