CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ottawa ankle rules

Medical guidelines

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ4291178 ↗
Source-derived summary

In medicine, the Ottawa ankle rules are a set of guidelines for clinicians to help decide if a patient with foot or ankle pain should be offered X-rays to diagnose a possible bone fracture. Before the introduction of the rules most patients with ankle injuries would have been imaged. However the vast majority of patients with unclear ankle injuries do not have bone fractures. As a result, many unnecessary X-rays were taken, which was costly, time-consuming and a slight health risk due to radiation exposure.

The Ottawa ankle rules

Ankle X-ray

Ankle X-ray is only required if:

There is any pain in the malleolar zone; and,

Any one of the following:

Bone tenderness along the distal 6 cm of the posterior edge of the tibia or tip of the medial malleolus, OR

Bone tenderness along the distal 6 cm of the posterior edge of the fibula or tip of the lateral malleolus, OR

An inability to bear weight both immediately and in the emergency department for four steps.

Foot X-ray series

Additionally, the Ottawa ankle rules indicate whether a foot X-ray series is required. It states that it is indicated if:

There is any pain in the midfoot zone; and,

Any one of the following:

Bone tenderness at the base of the fifth metatarsal (for foot injuries), OR

Bone tenderness at the navicular bone (for foot injuries), OR

An inability to bear weight both immediately and in the emergency department for four steps.

Certain groups are excluded, in particular pregnant women, and those with diminished ability to follow the test (for example due to head injury or intoxication). Several studies strongly support the use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children over 6 (98.5% sensitivity); however, their usefulness in younger children has not yet been thoroughly examined.

Usefulness

The rules have been found to have a very high sensitivity, moderate specificity, and therefore a very low rate of false negatives.

Editorial summary

“Ottawa ankle rules” enters the record as medical guidelines. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ottawa, ankle and rules can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 320-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ottawa, ankle and rules.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ottawa ankle rules” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ottawa, ankle and rules provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4291178. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ottawa ankle rules”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ottawa ankle rules primary sources, Ottawa ankle rules archive and Ottawa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ottawa ankle rules”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ottawa ankle rules” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.