CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ostracinda

ancient Greek boy game

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 31, 2025
Entity authorityQ117209773
Source-derived summary

Ostracinda or Ostrakinda (Ancient Greek: ὀστρακίνδα) was an ancient Greek game for boys, similar to modern Tag (game).

Two sides stand opposite divided by a line drawn on the ground. A boy throws up a shell or a dish, white on one side, and colored black (with pitch) on the other. As he throws the shell, he calls νὺξ (night), or ἡμέρα (day).

If the shell falls white side up, the competitor who represents the day pursues, and the competitor who represents the night runs away; if the shell falls black side up, the roles are reversed. As soon as someone is caught he is called ὄνος and is out of the game.

It is not precisely stated whether the game went on until all the fugitives were caught nor whether there was a point of safety to be reckoned, but it is very likely that the game was played with varying rules at different times and places.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Ostracinda” as ancient Greek boy game. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ostracinda, ancient and Greek.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 158-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Ostracinda, ancient and Greek providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ostracinda”, the useful work is to connect “ancient Greek boy game” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q117209773. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ostracinda”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ostracinda primary sources, Ostracinda archive and Ostracinda research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ostracinda”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ostracinda” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.