CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Oskar Pietsch

German production designer (1918-2012)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ1569361 ↗
Source-derived summary

Oskar Pietsch (1918–2012) was a German art director.

Selected filmography

Kein Hüsung (1954)

Der Ochse von Kulm (1955)

The Captain from Cologne (1956)

Berlin, Schoenhauser Corner (1957)

My Wife Makes Music (1958)

Love's Confusion (1959)

Auf Wiedersehen (film) (1961)

The Invisible Dr. Mabuse (1962)

References

Bibliography

Kalat, David. The Strange Case of Dr. Mabuse: A Study of the Twelve Films and Five Novels. McFarland, 2005.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Oskar Pietsch” as german production designer (1918-2012). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Oskar, Pietsch and German.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1918, 2012, 1954, 1955—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1918-01-10. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Oskar, Pietsch and German providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Oskar Pietsch”, the useful work is to connect “german production designer (1918-2012)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1569361. VIAF identifies the subject as 311614413. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1918, 2012, 1954 and 1955.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Oskar Pietsch”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Oskar Pietsch primary sources, Oskar Pietsch archive and Oskar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Oskar Pietsch”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Oskar Pietsch” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.