CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Osada Not

Japanese mangaka

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ11653424
Source-derived summary

Osada Not (Japanese: 長田ノオト, Hepburn: Osada Nōto; born March 16) is a Japanese manga artist and animator from Shizuoka Prefecture. She has made manga for horror magazines such as Suspense & Horror and Horror M, BL magazines such as June, Icarus and Reijin, and for the alt magazine Garo.

Biography

After working as an animator at Studio Pierrot and Hiroshi Sasagawa Office, they became a freelance animator.

They debuted as a manga artist on October 1986 in the first issue of the horror magazine Prom Night (プロムナイト), published by Kindai Eigasha (近代映画社), with the short story The Infinity Girl (永遠少女, Eien Shōjo).

She is a fan of the Tokyo Grand Guignol, whose plays she used as a basis and source of inspiration for short stories, she is a friend of Hiroyuki Tsunekawa, actor of Zera in Litchi Hikari Club, and of his wife Nuts Murakami, who has written stories for Not's manga.

She has made adaptations of Kenji Ohtsuki's novels for Horror M, the adaptation of The Ghostly Film of Lingwood Terrace (リンウッド・テラスの心霊フィルム, Rin'uddo Terasu no Shinrei Firumu) was serialized through the issues of May, June and August 1997; and the adaptation of Stacy (ステーシー, Sutēshī) through February to May 1998. Both were compiled in Stacy (ステーシー), published by Bunkasha in October 1998 and Kadokawa in September 2001.

Her adaptations of Edogawa Ranpo's novels were mostly serialized in Suspiria and All Kaidan.

Not was mostly active in horror manga, her works are labeled as aesthetic horror, their main characteristics are violence, cruel characters, bishōnen, eroguro, and beautiful artwork. She has also written more explicit eroguro works for BL magazines.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Osada Not” as japanese mangaka. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Osada, Japanese and mangaka.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1986, 1997, 1998, 2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Osada, Japanese and mangaka providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Osada Not”, the useful work is to connect “japanese mangaka” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11653424. VIAF identifies the subject as 255061863. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1986, 1997, 1998 and 2001.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Osada Not”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Osada Not primary sources, Osada Not archive and Osada research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Osada Not”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Osada Not” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.