Injury
Damage caused by an external source
Injury is physiological damage to an organism. The response to injury, whether in humans, in other animals, in plants, in fungi, or in single-celled eukaryotes such as choanoflagellates, is substantially shared, implying that the mechanisms are ancient.
Injuries can be caused in many ways, including mechanical trauma, toxins, interactions with other organisms, or abiotic factors in the environment. In many animal taxa, injury prompts an inflammatory response that initiates wound healing. In both plants and animals, substances are released to help occlude the wound, limiting fluid loss and the entry of pathogens. Many organisms secrete antimicrobial chemicals, which limit wound infection; animals have immune responses for the same purpose. Both plants and animals have mechanisms of regrowth that may result in complete or partial healing of the injury.
Taxonomic range
Animals
Injury in animals is sometimes defined as mechanical damage to an anatomical structure, but it has a wider connotation of physical damage with any cause, including drowning, burns, and poisoning. Such damage may result from attempted predation, territorial fights, falls, and abiotic factors.
Injury triggers an inflammatory response in animals of many different phyla.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Injury” is damage caused by an external source. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Injury, Damage and caused, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “damage caused by an external source” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q12421818. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Injury”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Injury primary sources, Injury archive and Injury research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Injury”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Injury” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.