CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Avitta

genus of insects

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ1368061
Source-derived summary

Avitta is a genus of moths of the family Noctuidae described by Francis Walker in 1858.

Description

Palpi sickle shaped, where the second joint reaching vertex of head. Third joint long and naked. Antennae long and ciliated in male. Thorax and abdomen smoothly scaled. Femur and tibia fringed with hair. Forewings with somewhat rounded apex. Hindwings with vein 5 from just above lower angle of cell.

Species

Avitta alternans Warren 1903

Avitta andamana Holloway 1984

Avitta aroa (Bethune-Baker 1906)

Avitta atripuncta Hampson 1926

Avitta bracteola Holloway 1976

Avitta bryonota Viette 1956

Avitta ceromacra Berio 1956

Avitta discipuncta Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874

Avitta ekeikei (Bethune-Baker 1906)

Avitta fasciosa Moore, 1882

Avitta flavicilia Holloway 1976

Avitta guttulosa (Swinhoe 1900)

Avitta habrarcha Viette 1956

Avitta inductalis (Snellen 1880)

Avitta insignans Hampson 1902

Avitta insignifica Hampson 1926

Avitta ionomesa Hampson 1926

Avitta lineosa (Saalmuller 1891)

Avitta longicorpus Prout, 1922

Avitta meeki Holloway 1984

Avitta microsundana Holloway 1984

Avitta novahibernia Holloway 198

Avitta obscurata (Swinhoe 1897)

Avitta ochromarginata Pagenstecher 1894

Avitta ophiusalis Walker, [1859]

Avitta pectinata Holloway 1979

Avitta polyscia (Joicey & Talbot 1917)

Avitta puncta Wileman, 1911

Avitta quadrilinea Walker, [1863]

Avitta rufifrons Moore, [1887]

Avitta simplicior Gaede 1940

Avitta subsignans Walker, 1858

Avitta surrigens (Walker 1863)

Avitta taiwana Wileman, 1915

Avitta zopheropa Turner, 1909

References

Savela, Markku. "Avitta Walker, 1858".

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Avitta” as genus of insects. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1858, 1903, 1984, 1906—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Avitta, genus and insects can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of insects. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1368061. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1858, 1903, 1984 and 1906.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Avitta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Avitta primary sources, Avitta archive and Avitta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Avitta”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Avitta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.