CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Oppo

Chinese consumer electronics manufacturer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ2084900
Source-derived summary

Oppo (stylized in lowercase "oppo" ) is a private Chinese consumer electronics manufacturer and technology company headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong.

Founded in 2004, its major product lines include smartphones, smart devices, audio devices, power banks, and other electronic products.

The company is one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world, with around 9% of the global market share, and 600 million global monthly active users across more than 60 markets. The company is also in the top three smartphone brands by sales in 20 regional markets, competing with major smartphone manufacturers like Samsung and Xiaomi.

Oppo also owns other smartphone brands such as Realme and OnePlus.

History

The brand name "Oppo" was registered in China in 2001 and launched in 2004 by Tony Chen in Dongguan, China. In 2005, they introduced their first device internationally, the Oppo X3 MP3 player. Since then, the company has expanded to over 50 countries and become a major player in electronic devices around the world.

In June 2016, Oppo became the largest smartphone manufacturer in China, selling its phones at more than 200,000 retail outlets.

In 2018, Oppo Digital announced that they were discontinuing their disc player business in major markets, and focusing on mobile devices.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Oppo” is chinese consumer electronics manufacturer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Oppo, Chinese and consumer, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004, 2001, 2005, 2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2004. For this dossier, Oppo, Chinese and consumer is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “chinese consumer electronics manufacturer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2084900. Authority coordinates are 22.765, 113.784. 2 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2004, 2001, 2005 and 2016.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Oppo”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Oppo primary sources, Oppo archive and Oppo research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Oppo”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Oppo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.