CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Open-shop scheduling

scheduling problem in computer science

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ7095711
Source-derived summary

Open-shop scheduling or open-shop scheduling problem (OSSP) is an optimization problem in computer science and operations research. It is a variant of optimal job scheduling. In a general job-scheduling problem, we are given n jobs J1, J2, ..., Jn of varying processing times, which need to be scheduled on m machines with varying processing power, while trying to minimize the makespan - the total length of the schedule (that is, when all the jobs have finished processing). In the specific variant known as open-shop scheduling, each job consists of a set of operations O1, O2, ..., On which need to be processed in an arbitrary order. The problem was first studied by Teofilo F. Gonzalez and Sartaj Sahni in 1976.

In the standard three-field notation for optimal job-scheduling problems, the open-shop variant is denoted by O in the first field. For example, the problem denoted by "O3|

p

i

j

{\displaystyle p_{ij}}

|

C

max

{\displaystyle C_{\max }}

" is a 3-machines job-shop problem with unit processing times, where the goal is to minimize the maximum completion time.

Definition

The input to the open-shop scheduling problem consists of a set of n jobs, another set of m workstations, and a two-dimensional table of the amount of time each job should spend at each workstation (possibly zero). Each job may be processed only at one workstation at a time, and each workstation can process only one job at a time. However, unlike the job-shop problem, the order in which the processing steps happen can vary freely.

Editorial summary

“Open-shop scheduling” enters the record as scheduling problem in computer science. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Open-shop, scheduling and problem can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1976—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Open-shop, scheduling and problem.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Open-shop scheduling” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Open-shop, scheduling and problem provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7095711. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Open-shop scheduling”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Open-shop scheduling primary sources, Open-shop scheduling archive and Open-shop research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Open-shop scheduling”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Open-shop scheduling” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.