CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pteridinium

genus of frond-like Ediacaran lifeforms

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ680300
Source-derived summary

Pteridinium is an extinct organism from the later Ediacaran of Africa, Asia, and North America, and was live around 567.3 – 543 Ma. It is a part of the Erniettomorpha class, and is composed of three vanes, or petaloids, in a canoe-like shape.

Discovery and history

The holotype and paratype fossils of Pteridinium were found in the Kliphoek Member of the Dabis Formation in Namibia, Africa. It would be formally described and named Pteridium simplex in 1930, but the name had already been in use since 1777 by Scopoli as the generic name for bracken fern, seeing the generic name for Pteridium changed to Pteridinium in 1933.

The original 1930 holotype and paratype fossils found and described by Georg Gürich were lost during World War II. As such, in 1955 the German paleontologist Rudolf Richter would nominate a neotype for Pteridinium, which is noted to most likely come from the Kuibis Formation. Two new specimens of Pteridinium would be found in the Floyd Chruch Formation in North Carolina in 1963 by John Brattain, a high school student. These would shown to Joseph St. Jean from the UNC Geology Department, who would misidentify them as Cambrian trilobites, placing them under the genus Paradoxides as ?Paradoxides carolinaensis in 1973. It would be later found out that these were actually Pteridinium fossils, and were accordingly moved to the genus as Pteridinium carolinaensis.

Description

Pteridinium is a three-vaned frondose fossil organism, composed of tubular modules, and with a canoe-like shape.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Pteridinium” is genus of frond-like Ediacaran lifeforms. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Pteridinium, genus and frond-like, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1930, 1777, 1933, 1955—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Pteridinium, genus and frond-like is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of frond-like Ediacaran lifeforms” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q680300. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1930, 1777, 1933 and 1955.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pteridinium”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pteridinium primary sources, Pteridinium archive and Pteridinium research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pteridinium”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pteridinium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.