Bijection
mathematical function which is a one-to-one mapping of sets

In mathematics, a bijection, bijective function, or one-to-one correspondence is a function between two sets such that each element of the second set (the codomain) is the image of exactly one element of the first set (the domain). Given a function
f
:
A
→
B
{\displaystyle f:A\to B}
, the image of an element
a
∈
A
{\displaystyle a\in A}
is the element
f
(
a
)
∈
B
{\displaystyle f(a)\in B}
in the codomain. The pre-image of an element
b
∈
B
{\displaystyle b\in B}
is any element
a
∈
A
{\displaystyle a\in A}
in the domain such that
f
(
a
)
=
b
{\displaystyle f(a)=b}
. Equivalently, a bijection is a relation between two sets such that each element of either set is paired with exactly one element of the other set.
A function is bijective if and only if it is invertible; that is, a function
f
:
X
→
Y
{\displaystyle f:X\to Y}
is bijective if and only if there is a function
g
:
Y
→
X
,
{\displaystyle g:Y\to X,}
the inverse of f, such that each of the two ways for composing the two functions produces an identity function:
g
(
f
(
x
)
)
=
x
{\displaystyle g(f(x))=x}
for each
x
{\displaystyle x}
in
X
{\displaystyle X}
and
f
(
g
(
y
)
)
=
y
{\displaystyle f(g(y))=y}
for each
y
{\displaystyle y}
in
Y
.
{\displaystyle Y.}
For example, the multiplication by two defines a bijection from the integers to the even numbers, which has the division by two as its inverse function.
A function is bijective if and only if it is both injective (or one-to-one)—meaning that each element in the codomain is mapped from at most one element of the domain—and surjective (or onto)—meaning that each element of the codomain is mapped from at least one element of the domain. The term one-to-one correspondence must not be confused with one-to-one function, which means injective but not necessarily surjective.
The elementary operation of counting establishes a bijection from some finite set to the first natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...), up to the number of elements in the counted set. It results that two finite sets have the same number of elements if and only if there exists a bijection between them.
“Bijection” enters the record as mathematical function which is a one-to-one mapping of sets. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bijection, mathematical and function can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Bijection” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bijection, mathematical and function provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q180907. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Bijection”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Bijection primary sources, Bijection archive and Bijection research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bijection”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Bijection” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.