CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

OMB Circular A-126

United States government circular

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ7072696 ↗
Source-derived summary

OMB Circular A-126, revised May 22, 1992, is a Government circular that introduces standards and policies to minimize the cost and improve the management and use of United States Government aircraft. Specifically, OMB Circular A-126 addresses the acquisition, management, usage, cost accounting, and disposal of government aircraft.

All policies presented by this circular apply to Executive Agencies, with special policy covering the travel by senior officials or non-Federal travelers on government aircraft that is government-owned, leased, chartered or rented and any related services that apply. The only exceptions are aircraft that is in use by or in support of the President or Vice President of the United States

The Office of Management and Budget was created in 1921 under the authority of the Budget and Accounting Act, revised in 1950 as the Budget and Accounting Procedures Act; again in 1970 as Reorganization Plan No. 2; as Executive Order 11541 and 31 U.S.C. § 1344.

Use and travel on government aircraft

Note: The sections below are intended only as a summary of government aircraft use policy. For specific concerns or questions about official government flight policy, refer to the official circular at the Office of Management and Budget

As stated in the circular, government aircraft are to be used for "defined official purposes", which is restricted to three categories:

"[T]ravel to meet mission requirements" i.e., travel to discharge an agency's official responsibilities

"[R]equired use travel" i.e., government aircraft are required to meet "bona fide communications or security needs" or as dictated by "exceptional scheduling requirements"

"[O]ther travel for the conduct of agency business"

There are outlined specifics that define "official travel" that must meet these specific criteria:

when no commercial airline or aircraft (including charter) service is reasonably available; specifically any schedule that does not meet the traveler's departure and/or arrival requirements within a 24-hour period

the cost of government aircraft usage is not more than the cost of using commercial airline or aircraft, including charter flights

aircraft may not be used on a "space available" basis unless:

the aircraft is already scheduled for an official purpose

the "space available" does not require a larger aircraft than needed

the "space available" use results in a minor additional cost to the government

Cost and reimbursement

The following conditions are not considered official business and require reimbursement to the government:

incidental private travel activities of an employee undertaken while on official travel that result in increased operating costs

wholly personal or political trips (reimbursement level set at "the full coach fare")

official trip during which political activities are attended and engaged in (the appropriate share of the full coach fare)

in which the employee flies to one or more locations for personal reasons (the excess of the full coach fare for all flights taken above the cost of the full coach fare to official business destinations)

The government is reimbursed for the cost or portion of the "full coach fare" applicable to the time not spent on required use travel. The "full coach fare" is defined as the cost of a ticket on a commercial airline available to the general public between the time the travel was planned and the day the travel was taken. For political travel, other laws and regulations may apply that require reimbursement in an amount greater than the "full coach fare".

Approval and documentation for government travel

Typically only an agency head or officials that are designated by the agency head may approve the use of agency aircraft, but government aircraft may also be used when it is also designated to transport senior Federal officials, members of their families or other non-Federal travelers on a "space available" basis but only when a written certification is presented by the agency.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “OMB Circular A-126” as united States government circular. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Circular, A-126 and United.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992, 1921, 1950, 1970—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1992-05-22. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Circular, A-126 and United providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “OMB Circular A-126”, the useful work is to connect “united States government circular” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7072696. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1992, 1921, 1950 and 1970.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “OMB Circular A-126”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow OMB Circular A-126 primary sources, OMB Circular A-126 archive and Circular research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “OMB Circular A-126”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “OMB Circular A-126” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.