CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Omar Moya

Cuban Paralympic athlete

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ7089770 ↗
Source-derived summary

Omar Moya is a paralympic athlete from Cuba competing mainly in category T11 sprint events.

Omar was part of the Cuban team that competed in the 1996 Summer Paralympics in Atlanta where he finished fourth in the final of the T11 100m and won gold in both the T11 200m and 400m.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Omar Moya” as cuban Paralympic athlete. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1901. The account is most persuasive where Omar, Moya and Cuban can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as cuban Paralympic athlete. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7089770. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1996.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Omar Moya”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Omar Moya primary sources, Omar Moya archive and Omar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Omar Moya”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Omar Moya” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.