CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Olivia Newman-Baronius

British Paralympic swimmer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ130215969 ↗
Source-derived summary

Olivia Newman-Baronius (born 23 December 2006) is a British paralympic swimmer.

Career

She competed at the 2024 Summer Paralympics and won a gold medal in the mixed 4 × 100m freestyle relay S14.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Olivia Newman-Baronius” is british Paralympic swimmer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Olivia, Newman-Baronius and British, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2024—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2006-01-01. For this dossier, Olivia, Newman-Baronius and British is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “british Paralympic swimmer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q130215969. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006 and 2024.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Olivia Newman-Baronius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Olivia Newman-Baronius primary sources, Olivia Newman-Baronius archive and Olivia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Olivia Newman-Baronius”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Olivia Newman-Baronius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.