CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Oliver Pöpsel

German politician (CDU)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ132733569 ↗
Source-derived summary

Oliver Reinhold Pöpsel (born 6 April 1973) is a German politician who was elected as a member of the Bundestag in 2025. He has served as deputy district administrator of Soest since 2020.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Oliver Pöpsel” as german politician (CDU). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Oliver, Pöpsel and German.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1973, 2025, 2020—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1973-04-06. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Oliver, Pöpsel and German providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Oliver Pöpsel”, the useful work is to connect “german politician (CDU)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q132733569. VIAF identifies the subject as 4423171191142758030000. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1973, 2025 and 2020.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Oliver Pöpsel”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Oliver Pöpsel primary sources, Oliver Pöpsel archive and Oliver research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Oliver Pöpsel”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Oliver Pöpsel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.