CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Olive Temple

Scottish traveller and author (1880–1936)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 30, 2025
Entity authorityQ18733702
Source-derived summary

Olive Susan Miranda Temple (née MacLeod; 18 February 1880 – 16 May 1936) was a Scottish writer and traveller, known for her work in natural history and ethnography. In 1910–1911, she journeyed 6,000 km (3,700 mi) through parts of Africa little known to Europeans to visit her fiancé's grave, and later published a book based on her observations. In Africa, she later met and married the colonial official Charles Lindsay Temple, and wrote a second book about the geography and ethnography of Northern Nigeria. The couple eventually settled in Granada.

Origins

Olive Susan Miranda MacLeod was born on 18 February 1880, the younger daughter of Sir Reginald MacLeod of MacLeod, the Chief of Clan MacLeod, by his wife, Lady Agnes Mary Cecilia, daughter of the 1st Earl of Iddesleigh. Her older sister was Dame Flora MacLeod of MacLeod.

First journey

Olive MacLeod was noted in her day as "one of the most intrepid of lady explorers". Her fiancé, the explorer Lieutenant Boyd Alexander, was murdered in 1910 during a dispute with some local inhabitants while travelling on the borderlands of Wadai to the north-east of Lake Chad. He was buried beside his brother Claud at Maifoni, a British Post near Lake Chad. MacLeod, who was distraught, endeavoured to visit his distant grave.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Olive Temple” as scottish traveller and author (1880–1936). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Olive, Temple and Scottish.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1880, 1936, 1910, 1911—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1880-01-17. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Olive, Temple and Scottish providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Olive Temple”, the useful work is to connect “scottish traveller and author (1880–1936)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q18733702. VIAF identifies the subject as 43843860. The Library of Congress control number is no00047564. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1880, 1936, 1910 and 1911.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Olive Temple”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Olive Temple primary sources, Olive Temple archive and Olive research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Olive Temple”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Olive Temple” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.