CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Olga Moroz

Belarusian archer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ27924754 ↗
Source-derived summary

Olga Moroz (born 9 December 1966) is an archer from Belarus. She represented her country at the 1996 and the 2000 Summer Olympics in archery.

1996 Summer Olympics

Moroz scored 645 points in the ranking round and finished 31st out of 64 competitors. In the round of 64 she defeated Cornelia Pfohl 158–152. In the round of 32 she lost 152–147 to Alison Williamson.

2000 Summer Olympics

Moroz scored 620 points in the ranking round and finished 41st out of 64 competitors. She lost 152–139 to Joanna Nowicka in the 64th round.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Olga Moroz” as belarusian archer. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1966, 1996, 2000—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1966-12-09. The account is most persuasive where Olga, Moroz and Belarusian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as belarusian archer. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27924754. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1966, 1996 and 2000.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Olga Moroz”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Olga Moroz primary sources, Olga Moroz archive and Olga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Olga Moroz”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Olga Moroz” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.