CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ohanapecosh Formation

geologic formation in Washington, United States

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ127685154
Source-derived summary

The volcaniclastic Ohanapecosh Formation is an early state of Cascade volcanism. It has been dated to the middle Oligocene [36 to 28 Ma]. The strata are as much as 3 kilometres (1.9 miles) thick, with exposures visible in more than 400 square kilometres (99,000 acres) of a total area exceeding 700 square kilometres (170,000 acres). It is found throughout Mount Rainier National Park and the surrounding mountains. It is the foundation on which the Mount Rainier volcano was built. The formation has been identified in the Snoqualmie area to the north, and as far south as the Columbia River Gorge, including Mount St. Helens and Mount Adams. It extends from the west at Mount Rainier and Lake Tapps, east to Little Naches River valley.

Description

The contact of the Ohanapecosh Formation on the Puget Group is everywhere conformable and the Spiketon Formation and Renton Formation reflect a continuous process without a break in time. In contrast, the contact with the Naches Formation is an unconformity as seen in the Summit Creek Sandstone (~43 to 37 Ma) in the areas from White Pass east to the Naches River.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Ohanapecosh Formation” as geologic formation in Washington, United States. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ohanapecosh, Formation and geologic.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 187-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Ohanapecosh, Formation and geologic providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ohanapecosh Formation”, the useful work is to connect “geologic formation in Washington, United States” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q127685154. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ohanapecosh Formation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ohanapecosh Formation primary sources, Ohanapecosh Formation archive and Ohanapecosh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ohanapecosh Formation”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ohanapecosh Formation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.