CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Occasio and Poenitentia

painting by Andrea Mantegna

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ3880642 ↗
Source-derived summary

Occasio and Poenitentia is a c.1500 grisaille fresco by Andrea Mantegna or his school. It is now displayed in the Palazzo San Sebastiano in Mantua after a long period over a fireplace in the Palazzo Cavriani. It was on display in Mantua's Palazzo Ducale from 1915 to 2002.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Occasio and Poenitentia” is painting by Andrea Mantegna. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Occasio, Poenitentia and painting, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1500, 1915, 2002—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1500-01-01. For this dossier, Occasio, Poenitentia and painting is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “painting by Andrea Mantegna” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3880642. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1500, 1915 and 2002.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Occasio and Poenitentia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Occasio and Poenitentia primary sources, Occasio and Poenitentia archive and Occasio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Occasio and Poenitentia”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Occasio and Poenitentia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.