Research and Development Branch
OSS branch responsible for inventing spy gadgets

In the United States, the Research and Development Branch (abbreviated as R&D; informally referred to as the Department of Dirty Tricks) was a branch of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), whose mission was to research and develop new technologies to aide Allied missions against the Axis powers during World War II. Operating in conjunction with the National Defense Research Committee to fulfill the special requests by OSS Headquarters, R&D was responsible for designing, testing, and procuring specialized equipment to support covert and clandestine operations, improve intelligence collection, and enable sabotage activities. R&D adapted and refined many clandestine issue items and supplied equipment primarily to the Secret Intelligence (SI) and Special Operations (SO) branches of OSS. The inventions of R&D were originated both by members of the US government, and by average US citizens who would submit their ideas – by the thousands – to the National Inventors Council. Most of these publicly originated ideas were nonsensical, and R&D would occasionally be forced to entertain them, especially if they were generated by high-ranking government officials, such as the infamous bat bomb and cat bomb experiments.
R&D produced suppressed and flashless pistols, deployable crossbows, assorted explosive devices, concealed cameras, and invisible inks and also worked with contractors to produce the low-cost single-shot 45-caliber “Liberator” pistol. R&D created forged documents, such as passports, currency, and postage stamps, and the methods to create forged documents in the field. It produced escape-and-evasion aids and covert tools, such as a cyanide “L” capsule intended to prevent forced disclosure, compact photographic gear disguised as commonplace objects, and folding lock-picking sets. R&D also experimented with brainwashing and devices to aid in psychological operations.
In order to effectively distribute items to US commanders, the OSS produced a mail order catalogue entitled OSS Weapons. The catalogue was distributed to all major US commands during the war for their respective commanders to select and field certain items. OSS Weapons also included inventions from the other US branches, to include the Air Force and the Navy.
“Research and Development Branch” enters the record as oSS branch responsible for inventing spy gadgets. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Research, Development and Branch can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Research and Development Branch” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Research, Development and Branch provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136559669. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Research and Development Branch”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Research and Development Branch primary sources, Research and Development Branch archive and Research research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Research and Development Branch”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Research and Development Branch” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.