Nuestra Belleza México 2016
22nd edition of Nuestra Belleza México
Nuestra Belleza México 2016, the 22nd annual Nuestra Belleza México pageant, was held at Foro 2 of Televisa San Angel in Mexico City on January 31, 2016. Twenty-nine contestants from Mexico competed for the national title, which was won by Kristal Silva from Tamaulipas who also competed in Miss Universe 2016. Silva was crowned by the outgoing Nuestra Belleza México titleholder Wendolly Esparza. She is the third person from Tamaulipas to win the title.
After three consecutive years, the final show of "Nuestra Belleza Mundo México" not was held. Rumors said that this was due to financing issues involving the renewal of the franchise. Other rumors also said that should it be renewed then the Mexican representative would be elected by the designation of a prior participant. On April 26, 2016 the Nuestra Belleza México Organization announced that they will not send a representative to Miss World after 21 years of having done so for the national organization.
The recognition "Corona al Mérito 2016" was for Carolina Morán, Nuestra Belleza Mundo México 2006 and TV hostess.
Results
Placements
Contestants
Source:
Replacements
Guanajuato – Samantha Peña was the winner of Nuestra Belleza Guanajuato 2015.
“Nuestra Belleza México 2016” enters the record as 22nd edition of Nuestra Belleza México. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Nuestra, Belleza and México can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Nuestra Belleza México 2016” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Nuestra, Belleza and México provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21010165. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016, 2006 and 2015.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Nuestra Belleza México 2016”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Nuestra Belleza México 2016 primary sources, Nuestra Belleza México 2016 archive and Nuestra research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nuestra Belleza México 2016”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Nuestra Belleza México 2016” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.