CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Grevillea celata

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ5607899 ↗
Source-derived summary

Grevillea celata, commonly known as Nowa Nowa grevillea or Colquhoun grevillea, is a species of flowering plant in the family Proteaceae and is endemic to a restricted part of Victoria in Australia. It is an erect and open to low, dense shrub with oblong, broadly elliptic or linear leaves, and red and yellow, or red, white and apricot-coloured, sometimes all yellow flowers.

Description

Grevillea celata is an erect, open or low, dense shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.4–1.8 m (1 ft 4 in – 5 ft 11 in) and forms suckers. Its leaves are oblong, broadly elliptic or linear, mostly 20–44 mm (0.79–1.73 in) long and 4–18 mm (0.16–0.71 in) wide with the edges turned down or rolled under. The lower surface of the leaves is woolly-hairy. The flowers are usually arranged in groups of two to eight on the ends of branchlets or short side shoots on a rachis 1–5 mm (0.039–0.197 in) long, and are red and yellow, or red, white and apricot-coloured, sometimes all yellow, the pistil 18–25 mm (0.71–0.98 in) long, the style red with a green base and tip. Flowering occurs from July to February, and the fruit is a woolly-hairy follicle 14–16 mm (0.55–0.63 in) long.

Grevillea alpina and G. chrysophaea are similar species, but neither forms suckers.

Taxonomy

Grevillea celata was first formally described in 1995 by Bill Molyneux in the journal Muelleria from specimens he collected from Colquhoun State Forest in south-eastern Victoria in 1993. The specific epithet (celata) means "hidden" or "concealed within", referring to the earlier confusion with G. alpina and G. chrysophaea.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Grevillea celata” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995, 1993—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Grevillea, celata and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5607899. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1995 and 1993.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Grevillea celata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Grevillea celata primary sources, Grevillea celata archive and Grevillea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Grevillea celata”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Grevillea celata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.