CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Notiocampus

genus of fishes

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ2189975
Source-derived summary

Notiocampus ruber, known commonly as the red pipefish, is a species of pipefish endemic to the temperate waters along the southern coast of Australia, including Tasmania. It occurs at depths from 5 to 20 m (16 to 66 ft) over the continental shelf. This species grows to a length of 16.4 cm (6.5 in) and is the only known member of its genus. N. ruber is a historically understudied species, with fewer than 12 records nationally prior to 2021, and its reproductive morphology and phylogenetic placement remained unresolved for more than four decades after the genus was described by C. E. Dawson in 1979.

Distribution and habitat

Notiocampus ruber has a broad but sparsely recorded distribution across temperate southern Australia, ranging from New South Wales to Western Australia and including Tasmania. Records are primarily from reef crevices and hard substrates at depths of 5 to 20 m (16 to 66 ft). Observations from Gamay (Botany Bay), New South Wales, between 2017 and 2021 documented individuals at approximately 12 m (39 ft) depth in mixed habitats comprising sand substrates and low-relief hard structures, frequently among feathery red macroalgae. The first known photograph of a living specimen was taken on the Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia, in 2007–2008.

Individuals are typically observed alone or in pairs, though aggregations of multiple individuals have been recorded. At least one individual exhibited short-term site fidelity, being repeatedly observed at the same location over a six-month period.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Notiocampus” is genus of fishes. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Notiocampus, genus and fishes, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 1979, 2017, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Notiocampus, genus and fishes is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of fishes” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2189975. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021, 1979, 2017 and 2007.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Notiocampus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Notiocampus primary sources, Notiocampus archive and Notiocampus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Notiocampus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Notiocampus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.