CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Not Three

1964 film

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ24885173
Source-derived summary

Not Three (French: Le pas de trois) is a 1964 French-Portuguese comedy film directed by Alain Bornet and starring Clara D'Ovar, Annie Fratellini and Jean-Loup Reynold.

Cast

Clara D'Ovar as Duke's daughter

Annie Fratellini as Duke's waitress

Jean-Loup Reynold as Chantagista / Blackmailer

Costinha as Duke's servant

Madeleine Delavaivre as Duchess

Jean Tissier as Duke

References

Bibliography

José de Matos Cruz. Cinema português: o dia do século. Grifo, 1998.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Not Three” is 1964 film. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Three and film, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1964, 1998—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1964. For this dossier, Three and film is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “1964 film” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24885173. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1964 and 1998.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Not Three”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Not Three primary sources, Not Three archive and Three research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Not Three”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Not Three” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.