CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Non-Importation Act

1806 US law forbidding the import of certain British goods

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ16958638
Source-derived summary

The Non-Importation Act, passed by the United States Congress on April 18, 1806, forbid any kind of import of certain British goods in an attempt to coerce Britain to suspend its interference with American merchant shipping. The Act was the first in a series of ineffective attempts of Congress and the administrations of President Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to respond economically instead of militarily to disputes with Britain and to other consequences of the Napoleonic Wars. The Act was part of the chain of events leading to the War of 1812.

Background

During the Napoleonic Wars, British and, to a lesser extent, French interference with American merchant shipping prompted Congress to take action. Given the United States' relative weakness compared to these powers, Congress explored economic measures as an alternative to military engagement. While some advocated for a full embargo, others supported more measured actions. After three months of debate, the limited measures gained initial support. The resulting act, effective November 15, 1806, aimed to pressure Britain through economic means and compel it to respect American shipping rights. However, the act's enforcement had unintended consequences for the U.S. economy.

Banned items

The following items were banned under the Non-Importation Act of 1806:

All articles of which leather, silk, hemp, flax, tin (except in sheets), or brass was the material of chief value

All woolen clothes whose invoice prices shall exceed 5/- sterling per square yard

Woolen hosiery of all kinds

Window, glass and glassware

Silver and plated goods

Paper

Nails

Spikes

Hats

Ready-made clothing

Playing cards

Beer, ale and porter

Pictures and prints

The penalties for infraction were a loss of the goods and a fine of three times their value.

Editorial summary

“Non-Importation Act” enters the record as 1806 US law forbidding the import of certain British goods. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Non-Importation, forbidding and import can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1806, 1812—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Non-Importation, forbidding and import.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Non-Importation Act” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Non-Importation, forbidding and import provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16958638. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1806 and 1812.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Non-Importation Act”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Non-Importation Act primary sources, Non-Importation Act archive and Non-Importation research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Non-Importation Act”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Non-Importation Act” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.