Race condition
situation in computer system that occurs when multiple processes try to access a common resource

A race condition or race hazard is the condition of an electronics, software, or other system where the system's substantive behavior is dependent on the sequence or timing of uncontrollable events, leading to unexpected or inconsistent results. It becomes a bug when one or more of the possible behaviors is undesirable.
The term race condition was in use by 1954, for example in David A. Huffman's doctoral thesis "The synthesis of sequential switching circuits".
Race conditions can occur especially in logic circuits or concurrent or distributed software programs. Using mutual exclusion can prevent race conditions.
In electronics
A typical example of a race condition may occur when a logic gate combines signals that have traveled along different paths from the same source. The inputs to the gate can change at slightly different times in response to a change in the source signal. The output may, for a brief period, change to an unwanted state before settling back to the designed state. Certain systems can tolerate such glitches, but if this output functions as a clock signal for further systems that contain memory, for example, the system can rapidly depart from its designed behaviour (in effect, the temporary glitch becomes a permanent glitch).
Consider, for example, a two-input AND gate fed with the following logic:
output
=
A
∧
A
¯
{\displaystyle {\text{output}}=A\wedge {\overline {A}}}
A logic signal
A
{\displaystyle A}
on one input and its Boolean negation
A
¯
{\displaystyle {\bar {A}}}
on another input can never, in theory, output a true value as
A
∧
A
¯
≠
1
{\displaystyle A\wedge {\overline {A}}\neq 1}
.
“Race condition” enters the record as situation in computer system that occurs when multiple processes try to access a common resource. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Race, condition and situation can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Race condition” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Race, condition and situation provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q616554. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1954.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Race condition”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Race condition primary sources, Race condition archive and Race research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Race condition”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Race condition” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.