CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Noise reduction coefficient

Sound absorption performance of a material

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ17083791
Source-derived summary

The noise reduction coefficient (commonly abbreviated NRC) is a single-number rating intended to describe the average sound absorption performance of a material, derived from reverberation-room measurements. In common usage it is reported on a scale from 0.0 (very low absorption) to 1.0 (very high absorption), though values greater than 1.0 can occur in reverberation-room testing due to measurement effects such as edge diffraction and non-ideal diffuse-field conditions rather than “more than 100%” absorption.

NRC should not be confused with the sound transmission class (STC), a single-number rating derived from laboratory measurements of airborne sound transmission loss through building elements (for example walls, doors and windows). In general terms, STC relates to sound transmission loss through a construction element, while NRC relates to sound absorbed within a room by surfaces and treatments, such as to dampen echos and reverberations.

Technical definition

The noise reduction coefficient is "a single-number rating, rounded to the nearest 0.05, of the sound absorption coefficients of a material for the four one-third octave bands at 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz". (note: it is commonly assumed that NRC is calculated based on the arithmetic average of the octave band absorption coefficients; however this is not in accordance with the ASTM C634-22 definition). The absorption coefficients of materials are commonly determined through use of standardized testing procedures, such as ASTM C423 that is used to evaluate the absorption of materials in eighteen one-third octave frequency bands with center frequencies ranging from 100 Hz to 5000 Hz. Absorption coefficients used to calculate NRC are commonly determined in reverberation rooms of qualified acoustical laboratory test facilities using samples of the particular materials of specified size (typically 72 square feet [6.7 m2] in an 8 ft × 9 ft [2.4 m × 2.7 m] configuration) and appropriate mounting.

In reverberation-room methods, absorption coefficients are derived from changes in measured reverberation time between an empty room and the room with the test specimen present; NRC is then reported as a rounded average of the selected one-third octave band coefficients.

History

Wallace Clement Sabine was the first scientist to study the sound-absorbing characteristics of materials in a scientifically rigorous manner.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Noise reduction coefficient” is sound absorption performance of a material. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Noise, reduction and coefficient, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1000, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Noise, reduction and coefficient is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “sound absorption performance of a material” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17083791. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1000 and 2000.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Noise reduction coefficient”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Noise reduction coefficient primary sources, Noise reduction coefficient archive and Noise research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Noise reduction coefficient”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Noise reduction coefficient” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.