CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Noémi Háfra

Hungarian handball player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ42959084
Source-derived summary

Noémi Háfra (born 5 October 1998) is a Hungarian handballer for Mosonmagyaróvári KC SE and the Hungarian national team.

In September 2018, she was included by EHF in a list of the twenty best young handballers to watch for the future.

She participated in the 2020 Summer Olympics and finished 7th.

Editorial summary

“Noémi Háfra” enters the record as hungarian handball player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Noémi, Háfra and Hungarian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 2018, 2020—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1998-10-05. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Noémi, Háfra and Hungarian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Noémi Háfra” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Noémi, Háfra and Hungarian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q42959084. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2018 and 2020.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Noémi Háfra”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Noémi Háfra primary sources, Noémi Háfra archive and Noémi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Noémi Háfra”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Noémi Háfra” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.