CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Nocardiopsis rhodophaea

species of bacterium

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ26269076 ↗
Source-derived summary

Nocardiopsis rhodophaea is a bacterium from the genus Nocardiopsis which has been isolated from hypersaline soil in China.

References

Further reading

Rummel, Patrice Dion, Chandra Shekhar Nautiyal, editors; foreword by John D. (2008). Microbiology of extreme soils. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-74231-9. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Dharumadurai, Dhanasekaran; Nooruddin, Thajuddin; A., Panneerselvam (2015). Antimicrobials: Synthetic and Natural Compounds. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4987-1563-8.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Nocardiopsis rhodophaea” as species of bacterium. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nocardiopsis, rhodophaea and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2015, 1563—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Nocardiopsis, rhodophaea and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nocardiopsis rhodophaea”, the useful work is to connect “species of bacterium” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q26269076. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2008, 2015 and 1563.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nocardiopsis rhodophaea”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nocardiopsis rhodophaea primary sources, Nocardiopsis rhodophaea archive and Nocardiopsis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nocardiopsis rhodophaea”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nocardiopsis rhodophaea” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.