CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Noblemaire principle

method of determining UN staff compensation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ139855654 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Noblemaire Principle is the foundational basis used by the United Nations (UN) and its common system to determine the conditions of service and base salary levels for staff in the Professional and higher categories. The primary purpose of the Noblemaire Principle is to ensure that the United Nations can attract and retain the best talent from around the world.

Background

Named after Georges Noblemaire, a French diplomat who chaired a 1921 League of Nations committee on the organization of the Secretariat, the principle establishes that international civil servants should be compensated at a level that allows the organization to recruit from all Member States, including the one with the highest salary levels, and which ensures equal pay for work of equal value regardless of the employee's nationality. Under this framework, the salaries of UN Professional staff are determined by reference to those applicable in the civil service of the country with the highest pay levels, known as the "comparator" civil service. The principle has been codified and administered by the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC), an independent expert body established by the UN General Assembly in 1975 to regulate conditions of service across the UN common system.

By aligning international compensation with the highest-paying national civil service, the UN aims to prevent a situation where citizens of high-income countries are financially disincentivized from joining the international civil service. Human Resources industry data consistently show that professionals generally will not leave their current employer for a new organization without a meaningful salary premium. HR practitioners and career specialists recommend professionals target a standard salary increase of 15 to 25 percent when changing companies. The ICSC regularly reviews UN compensation packages to ensure they remain competitive, arguing that adequate remuneration is essential for maintaining a highly skilled, diverse, and geographically representative workforce capable of executing the complex mandates of the UN system.

Since the inception of the United Nations in 1945, the United States federal civil service has served as the comparator under the Noblemaire Principle.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Noblemaire principle” is method of determining UN staff compensation. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Noblemaire, principle and method, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1921, 1975, 1945—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Noblemaire, principle and method is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “method of determining UN staff compensation” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q139855654. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1921, 1975 and 1945.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Noblemaire principle”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Noblemaire principle primary sources, Noblemaire principle archive and Noblemaire research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Noblemaire principle”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Noblemaire principle” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.