No to Keiko
Peruvian Social Collective
No to Keiko (Spanish: No a Keiko) is a Peruvian non-profit social movement with the objectives of "[making] sure the [Peruvian] population is aware that Keiko [Fujimori] is not a political alternative that can successfully maintain the sustained development of the country," and "defeating the undemocratic establishment of Fujimorism."
It was founded in May 2009 by the UL's students Giancarlo Navarro and Patricia Zevallos in Cajamarca. It is a prominent voice in the anti-Fujimorist movement.
Influence
This group has participated in various marches against the candidacy or in favor of the cancellation of the candidacy of the Peruvian politician Keiko Fujimori. They led two major marches against the Fuerza Popular (Fujimori's party) - the Gran Marcha Nacional: Keiko No Va! (Grand National March: Keiko will not go) that was held in Plaza San Martín, Lima, requesting a ban against Fujimori's candidacy in the 2016 presidential election, and the Marcha por la democracia: Keiko no Va! (March for Democracy: Keiko will not go) against Fujimori's candidacy and involved between 30 and 60 thousand peaceful protesters. On 31 May 2016, the slogan "No es odio, es amor al Perú" (No hate, only love for Peru) was shared widely on social media, strongly shifting the undecided vote towards Pedro Pablo Kuczynski instead of Fujimori. In November 2019, along with a large march against Fujimori and a social media campaign, the group campaigned for her to be brought in front of the courts for illegal activity as a writ of habeas corpus. During the 2021 Peruvian general election, No a Keiko organized several nationwide marches in opposition to Fujimori's accession to the second round of the presidential election. Marches in Lima, Cusco, Puno, Junín and in the south of Peru were held to rally support against Fujimori.
The public source identifies “No to Keiko” as peruvian Social Collective. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Keiko, Peruvian and Social.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “No to Keiko”, the useful work is to connect “peruvian Social Collective” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q100977812. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2016, 2019 and 2021.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “No to Keiko”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow No to Keiko primary sources, No to Keiko archive and Keiko research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “No to Keiko”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “No to Keiko” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.