CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Number Two

Wikimedia disambiguation page

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ395459
Source-derived summary

Number Two, No. 2, or similar may refer to:

Film

No. 2 (film), a 2006 New Zealand film

No. 2: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack, the soundtrack to the film

Number Two (film), a 1975 film directed by Jean-Luc Godard

Jackass Number Two, 2006

Dui Number (film) (translation of Number Two), a 2006 Bangladeshi film featuring Shakib Khan

Characters

Number Two (The Prisoner), a character from the British television series The Prisoner

Number Two (Battlestar Galactica) or Leoben Conoy, a character from the 2004 TV series

Numbuh Two, a character from the animated television series Codename: Kids Next Door

Number 2, a character in the Austin Powers series of films

Number two, a character from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams

Music

Bands and artists

No. 2 (band), an American alternative rock band

Paul Gray (American musician) (1972–2010), who used the pseudonym #2

Albums

N° 2, a 1959 Serge Gainsbourg album

2 (Mac DeMarco album), Mac DeMarco's 2012 debut album

#2 (Thees Uhlmann album), 2013

Songs

"Number 2" (KSI song), 2021

"Number 2" (Lil Tecca song), 2024

"Number Two", a 2008 song by They Might Be Giants from the album Here Come the 123s

"Number Two", a 2012 song by My Chemical Romance from the album Conventional Weapons

Other uses

2, the natural number

(To go) number 2, a slang term for defecation

No. 2 fuel oil or No.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Number Two” as wikimedia disambiguation page. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Number, Wikimedia and disambiguation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 1975, 2004, 1972—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Number, Wikimedia and disambiguation providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Number Two”, the useful work is to connect “wikimedia disambiguation page” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q395459. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 1975, 2004 and 1972.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Number Two”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Number Two primary sources, Number Two archive and Number research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Number Two”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Number Two” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.