CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur

Nigerien copyright collection society

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ4998339
Source-derived summary

Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur (BNDA) is the Niger office that manages copyright under the technical supervision of the Ministry of Culture and under the financial supervision of the Ministry of Finance. The director is Ganda Tahirou.

It became a member of the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers on October 15, 1997.

Editorial summary

“Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur” enters the record as nigerien copyright collection society. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bureau, Nigérien and Droit can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1997—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bureau, Nigérien and Droit.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bureau, Nigérien and Droit provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4998339. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur primary sources, Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur archive and Bureau research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bureau Nigérien du Droit d'Auteur” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.