Negishi coupling
chemical reaction

The Negishi coupling is a widely employed transition metal catalyzed cross-coupling reaction. The reaction couples organic halides or triflates with organozinc compounds, forming carbon–carbon bonds (C–C) in the process. A palladium (0) species is generally utilized as the catalyst, though nickel is sometimes used. A variety of nickel catalysts in either Ni0 or NiII oxidation state can be employed in Negishi cross couplings such as Ni(PPh3)4, Ni(acac)2, Ni(COD)2 etc.
R
−
X
+
R
′
−
Zn
X
′
→
PdL
n
or
NiL
n
R
−
R
′
{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}{}\\{\color {Red}{\ce {R}}}{-}{\color {Blue}{\ce {X}}}+{\color {Green}{\ce {R}}'}{-}{\ce {Zn}}{\color {Magenta}{\ce {X}}'}\ {\ce {->[{\ce {PdL}}_{n}{\text{ or }}{\ce {NiL}}_{n}]}}\ {\color {Red}{\ce {R}}}{-}{\color {Green}{\ce {R}}'}\end{matrix}}}
The leaving group X is usually chloride, bromide, or iodide, but triflate and acetyloxy groups are feasible as well. X = Cl usually leads to slow reactions.
The organic residue R = alkenyl, aryl, allyl, alkynyl or propargyl.
The halide X′ in the organozinc compound can be chloride, bromine or iodine and the organic residue R′ is alkenyl, aryl, allyl, alkyl, benzyl, homoallyl, and homopropargyl.
The metal M in the catalyst is nickel or palladium
The ligand L in the catalyst can be triphenylphosphine, dppe, BINAP, chiraphos or XPhos.
Palladium catalysts in general have higher chemical yields and higher functional group tolerance.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Negishi coupling” as chemical reaction. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as chemical reaction. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q902756. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Negishi coupling”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Negishi coupling primary sources, Negishi coupling archive and Negishi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Negishi coupling”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Negishi coupling” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.