CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Nick Forshager

American sound editor

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ113101030 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kurt Nicholas Forshager is an American sound editor. He won a Primetime Emmy Award and was nominated for eleven more in the category Outstanding Sound Editing.

Forshager has worked in the sound industry for more than thirty years and has served as president of the sound production company Wildtracks for over two decades. His work includes the television programs Breaking Bad (and its spin-off Better Call Saul), El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie, and Ozark.

Editorial summary

“Nick Forshager” enters the record as american sound editor. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Nick, Forshager and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 75-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Nick, Forshager and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Nick Forshager” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Nick, Forshager and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q113101030. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nick Forshager”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nick Forshager primary sources, Nick Forshager archive and Nick research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nick Forshager”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nick Forshager” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.