CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Nicholas of Freising

Franciscan friar and writer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 20, 2023
Entity authorityQ16957806
Source-derived summary

Nicholas of Freising, commonly known as Nicholas the Minorite, was a member of the Franciscan Order during the early 14th Century. He is presumed to be the author of the Chronicle of Nicholas the Minorite, an account of the conflict over Apostolic poverty under the reign of Pope John XXII. The Chronicle was written or assembled as early as 1338.

Chronicle of Nicholas the Minorite

The Chronicle of Nicholas the Minorite tells the story of how some Fraticelli, including Michael of Cesena and his followers Bonagrazia de Cesena and William of Ockham, came into conflict with Pope John XXII at his papal court in Avignon, were declared heretics, and ultimately sought refuge with Holy Roman Emperor Louis IV. Nicholas' Chronicle is primarily an assemblage of texts written by major participants in the conflict, and includes a narrative linking them together. While papal bulls such as Quia nonnumquam and Quia vir reprobus were circulated throughout Christendom, the Chronicle is the only surviving record of other texts documenting the dispute.

About the author

In the narrative of the Chronicle the author introduces himself as "I brother Nicholas of the Order of the Friars Minor." The name "Nicholas" is never mentioned however by the Chronicle's primary texts, which refer to the author as "brother N." One of the witnesses to Michael of Cesena's 1330 appeal against John XXII's papal bull Quia vir reprobus was a "Nicholas of Freising," a Fraticelli and follower of Cesena (Michaelist) from the Bavarian town of Freising, and this same Nicholas remains the most likely author of the Chronicle. The similarities between the writings of Michael of Cesena and the narrative of the Chronicle demonstrate that Nicholas derived much of his information, and theological perspective, from Cesena himself.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Nicholas of Freising” is franciscan friar and writer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nicholas, Freising and Franciscan, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1338, 1330—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Nicholas, Freising and Franciscan is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “franciscan friar and writer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 20, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q16957806. VIAF identifies the subject as 12738800. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1338 and 1330.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nicholas of Freising”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nicholas of Freising primary sources, Nicholas of Freising archive and Nicholas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nicholas of Freising”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Nicholas of Freising” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.