CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa

Vietnamese fencer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ26222328 ↗
Source-derived summary

Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa (born 21 February 1984) is a Vietnamese fencer. She competed in the women's épée event at the 2016 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa” is vietnamese fencer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nguyễn, Vietnamese and fencer, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1984-02-21. For this dossier, Nguyễn, Vietnamese and fencer is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “vietnamese fencer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q26222328. VIAF identifies the subject as 26530015. The Library of Congress control number is n2008008044. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1984 and 2016.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa primary sources, Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa archive and Nguyễn research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nguyễn Thị Như Hoa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.