CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Maggie Ng

Hong Kong tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ107987236 ↗
Source-derived summary

Maggie Ng (born 28 March 1996) is a Hong Kong female tennis player.

Ng has a career-high singles ranking by the WTA of 640, achieved on 10 June 2019. She also has a career-high WTA doubles ranking of 657, achieved on 7 November 2022.

Playing for Hong Kong in Fed Cup, she has a career win/loss record of 10–4.

In 2018, Maggie Ng won Prudential Hong Kong National Tennis Championships singles and doubles.

At the 2019 Summer Universiade held in Naples, Italy, she won a bronze medal in women's doubles, along with Eudice Chong.

Her first WTA Tour main-draw appearance came at the 2015 Hong Kong Open where she partnered with Ki Yan-tung in the doubles event.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Maggie Ng” as hong Kong tennis player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Maggie, Hong and Kong.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 2019, 2022, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1996-03-28. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Maggie, Hong and Kong providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Maggie Ng”, the useful work is to connect “hong Kong tennis player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q107987236. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1996, 2019, 2022 and 2018.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Maggie Ng”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Maggie Ng primary sources, Maggie Ng archive and Maggie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Maggie Ng”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Maggie Ng” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.