CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Newton–Cotes formulas

formulas for numerical integration

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ944241 ↗
Source-derived summary

In numerical analysis, the Newton–Cotes formulas, also called the Newton–Cotes quadrature rules or simply Newton–Cotes rules, are a group of formulas for numerical integration (also called quadrature) based on evaluating the integrand at equally spaced points. They are named after Isaac Newton, who originated the formulas, and Roger Cotes, who expanded upon Newton's work.

Newton–Cotes formulas can be useful if the value of the integrand at equally spaced points is given and when the integrand is known to have only a finite number of continuous derivatives. If the integrand is infinitely differentiable and it is possible to change the points at which the integrand is evaluated, then other methods such as Gaussian quadrature and Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature may yield higher precision per function evaluation.

Description

It is assumed that the value of a function f defined on

[

a

,

b

]

{\displaystyle [a,b]}

is known at

n

+

1

{\displaystyle n+1}

equally spaced points:

a

≤

x

0

<

x

1

<

⋯

<

x

n

≤

b

{\displaystyle a\leq x_{0}<x_{1}<\dots <x_{n}\leq b}

. There are two classes of Newton–Cotes quadrature: they are called "closed" when

x

0

=

a

{\displaystyle x_{0}=a}

and

x

n

=

b

{\displaystyle x_{n}=b}

, i.e. they use the function values at the interval endpoints, and "open" when

x

0

>

a

{\displaystyle x_{0}>a}

and

x

n

<

b

{\displaystyle x_{n}<b}

, i.e. they do not use the function values at the endpoints. Newton–Cotes formulas using

n

+

1

{\displaystyle n+1}

points can be defined (for both classes) as

∫

a

b

f

(

x

)

d

x

≈

∑

i

=

0

n

w

i

f

(

x

i

)

,

{\displaystyle \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx\approx \sum _{i=0}^{n}w_{i}\,f(x_{i}),}

where

for a closed formula,

x

i

=

a

+

i

h

{\displaystyle x_{i}=a+ih}

, with

h

=

b

−

a

n

{\displaystyle h={\frac {b-a}{n}}}

,

for an open formula,

x

i

=

a

+

(

i

+

1

)

h

{\displaystyle x_{i}=a+(i+1)h}

, with

h

=

b

−

a

n

+

2

{\displaystyle h={\frac {b-a}{n+2}}}

.

The number h is called step size,

w

i

{\displaystyle w_{i}}

are called weights.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Newton–Cotes formulas” is formulas for numerical integration. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Newton, Cotes and formulas, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 353-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Newton, Cotes and formulas is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “formulas for numerical integration” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q944241. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Newton–Cotes formulas”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Newton–Cotes formulas primary sources, Newton–Cotes formulas archive and Newton research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Newton–Cotes formulas”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Newton–Cotes formulas” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.