CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Newton baronets of Newton (1697)

extinct baronetcy

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ140354714 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Newton baronetcy, of Newton in the County of Haddington, was created in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia on 23 April 1697 for Richard Newton. He was the son of Richard Newton and his wife Julian, sister of Patrick Hume, 1st Earl of Marchmont; the creation of Newton's title took place on the same day as Hume's earldom.

Newton married, by 1702, Helen Livingstone. She was the niece and heiress of Sir James Livingstone, 1st Baronet of Westquarter (died 1701). This marriage, however, did not bring Newton the Westquarter estate. The title became extinct on his death c.1727.

Newton baronets, of Newton (1697)

Sir Richard Newton, 1st Baronet (died c.1727), left no heir.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Newton baronets of Newton (1697)” is extinct baronetcy. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Newton, baronets and extinct, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1697, 1702, 1701, 1727—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Newton, baronets and extinct is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “extinct baronetcy” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q140354714. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1697, 1702, 1701 and 1727.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Newton baronets of Newton (1697)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Newton baronets of Newton (1697) primary sources, Newton baronets of Newton (1697) archive and Newton research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Newton baronets of Newton (1697)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Newton baronets of Newton (1697)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.