CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17

International cricket tour

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ23019811 ↗
Source-derived summary

The New Zealand cricket team toured Australia in December 2016 to play three One Day Internationals (ODIs) matches. The matches were played for the Chappell–Hadlee Trophy.

The series ended with a 3–0 victory to Australia. It was just the second time New Zealand had suffered a whitewash to Australia, the first being in New Zealand in 2005.

Editorial summary

“New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17” enters the record as international cricket tour. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Zealand, cricket and team can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016, 2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Zealand, cricket and team.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Zealand, cricket and team provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23019811. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2005.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17 primary sources, New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17 archive and Zealand research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2016–17” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.