Neuropsychiatric Forum
Open-knowledge reference entry
Neuropsychiatric Forum (NPF) (Czech: Neuropsychiatrické fórum) is an international non-profit educational institution and professional organization whose primary mission is the development of neuropsychiatry. NPF was founded in 2011 in Prague, Czech Republic. In June 2011, NPF organized the first conference in Kaiserstein Palace in Prague attended by over 200 neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychologists.
NPF collaborates with several other professional organizations such as the European Society for Trauma and Dissociation (ESTD) and the European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT).
NPF has similar scope like some other associations include the American Neuropsychiatric Association (ANPA), the British Neuropsychiatry Association (BNPA), or the International Neuropsychiatric Association.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Neuropsychiatric Forum” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Neuropsychiatric, Forum and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q12040811. VIAF identifies the subject as 7146513422332212139. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Neuropsychiatric Forum”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Neuropsychiatric Forum primary sources, Neuropsychiatric Forum archive and Neuropsychiatric research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Neuropsychiatric Forum”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Neuropsychiatric Forum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.