Neunkirchen District, Austria
district in Austria
Bezirk Neunkirchen (German: [ˈnɔʏnˌkɪʁçn̩] ) is a district of the state of Lower Austria in Austria. It is located at the south of the state.
Municipalities
Altendorf
Parts of the village: Altendorf, Loitzmannsdorf, Schönstadl, Syhrn, Tachenberg
Aspang-Markt
Aspangberg-Sankt Peter
Parts of the village: Großes Amt, Kleines Amt, Neustift am Alpenwald, Neuwald
Breitenau
Breitenstein
Buchbach
Bürg-Vöstenhof
Parts of the village: Bürg, Vöstenhof
Edlitz
Enzenreith
Parts of the village: Enzenreith, Hart, Hilzmannsdorf, Köttlach, Thürmannsdorf, Wörth
Feistritz am Wechsel
Parts of the village: Feistritz am Wechsel, Grottendorf, Hasleiten, Hollabrunn
Gloggnitz
Parts of the town: Abfaltersbach, Aue, Berglach, Eichberg, Gloggnitz (with Furth and Gföhl), Graben, Heufeld, Saloder, Stuppach, Weißenbach
Grafenbach-Sankt Valentin
Parts of the village: Göttschach, Grafenbach, Ober-Danegg, Penk, St. Valentin-Landschach
Grimmenstein
Parts of the village: Grimmenstein, Hochegg
Grünbach am Schneeberg
Parts of the village: Grünbach am Schneeberg, Neusiedl am Walde
Höflein an der Hohen Wand
Parts of the village: Oberhöflein, Unterhöflein, Zweiersdorf
Kirchberg am Wechsel
Parts of the village: Alpeltal, Kirchberg (with Au, Markt, Molz, Rammergraben, Sachsenbrunn, Sellhof, Stein, Tratten, Weyer, Wieden Wiese), Kranichberg (with Baumtal, Eselberg, Friederdorf, Kiengraben, Oberer Kirchbgraben, Kreith, Kreithberg, Pucha, Pyhra, Rams), Lehen (Ortsteile Nebelsbach, Steinbach), Molzegg (with Kampsteiner Schwaig, Kreuzbauern, Molz, Steyersberger Schwaig), Ofenbach (with Eigenberg, Wieden)
Mönichkirchen
Parts of the village: Am Hartberg, Feldbauern, Mönichkirchner Schwaig, Pfeffergraben, Tauchen, Unterhöfen
Natschbach-Loipersbach
Parts of the village: Natschbach, Loipersbach (with Lindgrub)
Neunkirchen
Parts of the town: Neunkirchen (with Innere Stadt, Tal, Steinplatte, Mühlfeld, Au, Steinfeld, Lerchenfeld, Blätterstraßensiedlung), Mollram, Peisching
Otterthal
Payerbach
Parts of the village: Geyerhof, Kreuzberg, Küb, Mühlhof, Payerbach, Pettenbach, Schmidsdorf, Schlöglmühl, Werning
Pitten
Parts of the village: Pitten, Sautern, Leiding-Inzenhof
Prigglitz
Parts of the village: Gasteil, Prigglitz, Stuppachgraben
Puchberg am Schneeberg
Parts of the village: Knipflitz, Losenheim, Puchberg, Rohrbachgraben, Schneebergdörfl, Sonnenleiten, Stolzenwörth
Raach am Hochgebirge
Parts of the village: Egg, Raach am Hochgebirge, Schlagl, Sonnleiten, Wartenstein
Reichenau an der Rax
Parts of the village: Edlach, Grünsting, Hirschwang, Klein- und Großau, Prein, Reichenau
Scheiblingkirchen-Thernberg
Parts of the village: Gleißenfeld, Reitersberg, Scheiblingkirchen, Thernberg, Witzelsberg
Schottwien
Parts of the village: Göstritz, Greis, Schottwien
Schrattenbach
Parts of the village: Greith, Gutenmann, Hornungstal, Rosental, Schrattenbach
Schwarzau am Steinfeld
Parts of the village: Guntrams, Schwarzau am Steinfeld
Schwarzau im Gebirge
Parts of the village: Gegend, Naßwald, Preintal, Vois
Seebenstein
Parts of the village: Schiltern, Seebenstein, Sollgraben
Semmering
Sankt Corona am Wechsel
Sankt Egyden am Steinfeld
Parts of the village: Gerasdorf am Steinfeld, Neusiedl am Steinfeld, Saubersdorf, St. Egyden am Steinfeld, Urschendorf
Ternitz
Parts of the village: Dunkelstein, Flatz, Mahrersdorf, Pottschach, Putzmannsdorf, Raglitz, Rohrbach am Steinfelde, St.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Neunkirchen District, Austria” is district in Austria. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Neunkirchen, District and Austria, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “district in Austria” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q694386. VIAF identifies the subject as 247854952. Authority coordinates are 47.727, 16.082. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.
A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Neunkirchen District, Austria”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Neunkirchen District, Austria primary sources, Neunkirchen District, Austria archive and Neunkirchen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Neunkirchen District, Austria”?
- What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
- Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Neunkirchen District, Austria” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.