CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Evergreen Korea Party

2017–2018 political party in South Korea

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 24, 2024
Entity authorityQ27953072 ↗
Source-derived summary

Evergreen Korea Party (Korean: 늘푸른한국당) was a liberal conservative political party in South Korea, founded on January 11, 2017. Lee Jae-oh and Choi Byung-kuk were co-chairpersons of the party.

The party officially dissolved on February 9, 2018, with most members rejoining the Liberty Korea Party.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Evergreen Korea Party” as 2017–2018 political party in South Korea. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Evergreen, Korea and Party.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2017-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Evergreen, Korea and Party providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Evergreen Korea Party”, the useful work is to connect “2017–2018 political party in South Korea” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 24, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q27953072. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2017 and 2018.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Evergreen Korea Party”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Evergreen Korea Party primary sources, Evergreen Korea Party archive and Evergreen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Evergreen Korea Party”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Evergreen Korea Party” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.