CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie

scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ21385000 ↗
Source-derived summary

Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie is a peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in geology and paleontology. The journal is published monthly, with 4 volumes per year.

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded and Current Contents. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2019 impact factor of 0.981.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie” as scientific journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Neues, Jahrbuch and Geologie.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1950. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Neues, Jahrbuch and Geologie providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie”, the useful work is to connect “scientific journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q21385000. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2019.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie primary sources, Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie archive and Neues research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.