CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ5317436 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Netherlands toured Scotland from 21 June to 29 June 2011. The tour originally consisted of three Twenty20 Internationals (T20) and one ICC Intercontinental Cup match, but the Twenty20 Internationals were replaced by a pair of One Day Internationals (ODI).

Editorial summary

“Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dutch, cricket and team can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dutch, cricket and team.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dutch, cricket and team provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5317436. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011 primary sources, Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011 archive and Dutch research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dutch cricket team in Scotland in 2011” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.